Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between Project Lazarus implementation and buprenorphine utilization, by strategy, North Carolina, 2009–2014

From: Associations between implementation of Project Lazarus and opioid analgesic dispensing and buprenorphine utilization in North Carolina, 2009–2014

    

Univariate Modelsa

Multivariable Adjusted Modelb

Strategy

Implementation Level

County-months

Monthly Bup. Patients

IRR

95% CI

CLR

IRR

95% CI

CLR

Diversion Control

None

4971

266,389

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

2229

323,576

1.82

1.71, 1.93

1.128

1.00

0.93, 1.08

1.165

Naloxone Policies

None

6216

443,181

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

984

146,784

1.67

1.57, 1.78

1.133

1.02

0.96, 1.08

1.122

Community Education

None

5969

379,482

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

1231

210,483

1.68

1.59, 1.78

1.117

0.98

0.91, 1.05

1.164

Provider Education

None

4962

303,822

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

2238

286,143

1.77

1.68, 1.87

1.117

1.00

0.93, 1.07

1.148

Support for Patients with Pain

None

6684

454,973

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

516

134,992

1.54

1.45, 1.64

1.131

0.93

0.85, 1.02

1.200

Hospital ED Policy

None

5485

360,241

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

1715

229,724

1.68

1.57, 1.80

1.146

0.98

0.92, 1.04

1.134

Addiction Treatment (Policy Only)

None

6549

512,646

1 (ref.)

  

1 (ref.)

  

Any

651

77,319

1.62

1.51, 1.74

1.148

0.98

0.91, 1.06

1.161

  1. IRR incidence rate ratio, CI confidence interval, CLR confidence limit ratio, ED Emergency Department
  2. Results from Poisson GEE with county-month population offset
  3. aUnivariate unadjusted models for each strategy
  4. bAdjusted multivariable model adjusts for the other six strategies, county opioid analgesic prescribing rate, county health status, year and season