Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the original (SIC-1.0) and revised (SIC-2.0) subsequent injury categorisation models

From: Comparison of subsequent injury categorisation (SIC) models and their application in a sporting population

SIC-2.0 data-driven category (Toohey et al. 2018)

SIC-2.0 clinical category (Toohey et al. 2018)

Category description

SIC-1.0 category (Finch and Cook 2014)

I

1

No subsequent injury; only one injury was sustained by the athlete throughout the surveillance period

1

II

2

Re-injury after recovery, to the same site, same nature, same side, and same structure (related)

2a

3

Re-injury after recovery, to the same site, same nature, same side, and same structure (unrelated)

6a

III

4

Acute exacerbation before recovery, to the same site, same nature, same side, and same structure

3a

5

Continual/sporadic exacerbation before recovery, to the same site, same nature, same side, and same structure (related)

4a

6

Continual/sporadic exacerbation before recovery, to the same site, same nature, same side, and same structure (unrelated)

5a

IV

7

Injury to the same site, same nature, same side, but of a different structure (related)

2-6a

8

Injury to the same site, same nature, same side, but of a different structure (unrelated)

2-6a

V

9

Injury to the same site, same nature, but different side (related)

2-6a

10

Injury to the same site, same nature, but different side (unrelated)

2-6a

VI

11

Injury to the same site but of a different nature (related)

7

12

Injury to the same site but of a different nature (unrelated)

8

VII

13

Injury to a different site, but of the same nature (related)

9b

14

Injury to a different site, but of the same nature (unrelated)

10b

VIII

15

Injury to a different site and of a different nature (related)

9b

16

Injury to a different site and of a different nature (unrelated)

10b

  1. Adapted from Toohey et al., 2018 (Toohey et al. 2018) with permission
  2. a side and structure of injury was not differentiated in the SIC-1.0 model; b injury nature at different site was not differentiated in the SIC-1.0 model